
1st Phorm’s ‘110% Money-Back Guarantee’
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
In October 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Philadelphia Federal Credit Union for allegedly misleadingly representing that the credit union charges only one insufficient funds fee on a single transaction when, according to the complaint, the credit union charges a fee every time that a rejected transaction is reprocessed for payment resulting in multiple fees on a single transaction. (Dailey et al v. Philadelphia Federal Credit Union, Case No. 191002749, Pennsylvania State Court – Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County)
Money-back guarantee comes up woefully short of advertised percentage.
Is it still a guarantee if it has strings attached?
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.