There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In June 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against the credit union SEFCU for, among other things, allegedly misrepresenting that it charges overdraft fees when customers do not have enough money in their account to cover a transaction without telling customers that the credit union does not base these charges on the actual amount in the account and instead uses an artificial balance that deducts amounts that have been put on hold for pending transactions. (Story et al v. SEFCU, Case No. 18-cv-764, N.D.N.Y.)
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.