
Keto Fat Bomb
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the product as having “Zero Added Sugar”
Gonzales et al. v. Glanbia Performance Nutrition (Manufacturing), Inc.
22-cv-5909, C.D. Cal.
(July 2022)
Optimum Nutrition Essential Energy powder supplements
Misleadingly using You know when you buy a big bag of chips, and you’re all psyched for a feast, and then it turns out there are like, three chips in the bag? That bag is slack filled.ed containers
Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the product as having “Zero Added Sugar”
Allegations: Falsely marketing products as containing no artificial sweeteners
Allegations: Falsely marketing products that products are natural and contain more calories than advertised
Allegations: Falsely marketing that foods do not contain any genetically modified ingredients (GMOs)
Allegations: Falsely marketing that products are “clinically proven” to help consumers “lose weight & keep it off” when scientific evidence does not support such claims
Recent inquiry takes aim at company’s “clinically proven” weight-loss claims, with a somewhat surprising result.