Jury Hands Down a Verdict in Prevagen Deceptive Marketing Case
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
October 2016: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. for undisclosed reasons.
April 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Omega Natural Science for allegedly deceptively offering an automatic monthly refill subscription for OmegaBrite Gelcap supplements without adequately disclosing the terms of the offer and cancellation policy. (Kissel et al v. Omega Natural Science, Inc. and Does 1-10, Case No. 16-cv-2770, C.D. Cal.)
For more information about negative option offers and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
Regulators have a beef with company’s climate pledge.
Consumers need to be wary of undisclosed incentivized reviews.
Why TINA.org supports FTC’s proposed changes to COPPA Rule but pushes for more.
FTC alleges company pressures consumers into overpaying for its tax filing software.