
HP Envy 13 Ultrabook Laptops with NVIDIA GeForce MX150 Graphics Cards
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the speed and performance of laptops when only certain versions of the laptop perform as advertised
December 2016: A federal judge granted final approval of the settlement.
August 2016: A federal judge preliminarily approved this settlement. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for December 7, 2016.
July 2016: After 15 similar class-action lawsuits against Nvidia Corp. were consolidated, the parties moved for preliminary approval of a settlement agreement. According to the proposed settlement terms, class members may receive a $30 cash refund for each unit purchased. (In Re Nvidia GTX 970 Graphics Chip Litigation, Case No. 15-cv-760, N. D. CA.)
2015: Between February and July 2015, at least seven class-action lawsuits were filed against Nvidia Corporation for allegedly falsely representing the specifications and capabilities of the Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 graphics processing units. Among other things, the complaints allege that the company misleadingly markets the graphics cards as providing 4 GB of VRAM and 64 ROPs when, in reality, they do not.
To read the complaints, click on the case information below.
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing the speed and performance of laptops when only certain versions of the laptop perform as advertised
In April 2017, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Micro-Star International Co. and MSI Computer Corp. for allegedly misleadingly marketing that consumers can upgrade the graphics card in the GT…
Lawsuits allege “100%” marketing on front label is misleading.
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.
Be wary of these life-changing claims.
TINA.org reader receives a suspicious email.