There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Lejman et al. v. A1 Development LLC d/b/a NoLimitCoins
25-cv-10984, N.D. Ill.
(Sept. 2025)
Portugal et al. v. A1 Development LLC d/b/a NoLimitCoins
25-cv-6505, N.D. Cal.
(Aug. 2025)
Salgado et al. v. A1 Development, LLC d/b/a No Limit Coins
25-cv-6061, E.D.N.Y.
(Oct. 2025)
NoLimitCoins
Misleadingly representing the platform as a “social casino” when it is actually a form of illegal gambling
Pending
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.