
U-Haul Needs to Pack Up Its Deceptive ‘$19.95’ Truck Ads
TINA.org calls on regulators to stop moving company’s bait and switch.
October 2014: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.. The reasons have not been disclosed.
June 2014: A false advertising class-action lawsuit against the marketer of Nitrix, a dietary supplement, was transferred from state court to federal court. Among other things, plaintiffs claim that the company markets Nitrix as an Advanced Strength dietary supplement containing Arginine Ethyl Esther when, in reality, tests show that the supplement does not contain a detectable amount of the ingredient. (Conde et al v. Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition, Inc., Glanbia Public Ltd. Co., and Does 1-10, Case No. 14-cv-00945, C. D. CA.).
For more information about supplements, click here.
TINA.org calls on regulators to stop moving company’s bait and switch.
Complaint alleges IML was a $1.2 billion scam.
What you should know about ingredient studies.
Will master resell rights actually give you the dream life?
Tanya Gazdik, Media Post