New York & Company’s Discounts
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices
December 2016: A federal judge dismissed this action finding that plaintiffs failed to meet the heightened pleading standard required for fraud-based claims and lacked standing. Some of the claims were dismissed with leave to amend while one claim was dismissed without leave to amend.
February 2016: A class-action lawsuit was filed against New York & Company Stores for allegedly misleadingly advertising discounts by comparing sale prices to false market prices. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the market prices were artificially inflated and were never the original prices for the products. In addition, the complaint alleges that the market prices were not the prevailing market prices within the three months immediately before the advertisement, as required by California law. (Rael et al v. New York & Company, Inc., New York & Company Stores, Inc., and Does 1-50, Case No. 16-cv-369, S. D. CA.)
For more information about misleadingly advertised discounts and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices
Allegations: Falsely advertising discounts off of artificially inflated reference prices
Allegations: Misleadingly advertising discounts from artificially inflated reference prices
Jenny Ahn, Michelle Cera, Ruth Reader, Hunterbrook
Lawsuits allege marketing doesn’t pass the smell test.
Recent ad encourages mothers to prioritize their mental health.
Can these bottles really keep drinks hot for up to six hours?
TINA.org and other consumer advocates file comment with FTC.