
Wood-N-Tap
Getting hangry over a hidden delivery fee.
In March 2014, the parties agreed to dismiss a lawsuit against Nestlé USA, Inc. The complaint – which was filed in February 2014 – alleged that the company misbrands several varieties of instant coffees – including Nescafe Decaf Taster’s Choice Decaf House Blend and Nescafe Decaf Clasico Decaf Dark Roast — as decaffeinated when they actually contain almost as much caffeine as soda. The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice, meaning that the plaintiffs can refile. We could not determine the reason(s) the parties agreed to dismiss the lawsuit. (Estrada et al v. Nestlé USA, Inc., et al, Case No. 14-cv-00989, C. D. CA.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits against Nestlé and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
For more information about other class-action lawsuits regarding coffee and TINA.org’s coverage of the product, click here.
Getting hangry over a hidden delivery fee.
A deceptive marketing trend takes root.
Legislators should protect the work of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
What does “human-grade” dog food actually mean?
The statement, “Manufactured in the USA 100%,” had appeared on product packaging.