Broadway.com
Pulling back the curtain on this official-sounding website.
Petersen et al. v. Natera, Inc.
24-cv-7062, N.D. Cal.
(Oct. 2024)
Natera’s PGT-A testing (preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy)
Falsely marketing that testing increases the chances of embryo implantation and healthy pregnancies, and decreases the chances of miscarriage and time to pregnancy, when studies show there is no difference between cycles that use PGT-A and cycles that don’t
Falsely marketing tests as 99% accurate when studies show that the accuracy of PGT-A is significantly lower than advertised
Pending
Pulling back the curtain on this official-sounding website.
Can these “robot” puppies replace man’s best friend?
Can you actually work out without the work?
MADISON, CONN. Feb. 11, 2026 – A company calling itself “Patent & Trademark Office” is violating the FTC’s Impersonation Rule as well as the FTC Act by falsely posing as…
Complaint to FTC cites violations of agency’s Impersonation Rule.