Confession: I Fell for HelloFresh’s ‘Free Breakfast’
A reminder to be careful about ad claims that may seem too good to be true.
November 2014: A federal judge granted Merck & Co., Inc.’s motion to dismiss this class-action lawsuit finding that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sets out the appropriate labeling requirements for over-the-counter sunscreens and therefore the court should defer to the government agency on such claims.
June 2014: Another class-action lawsuit was filed against Merck & Co., Inc. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the company misleadingly markets sunscreens in the Coppertone SPF 55-100+ Collection as providing greater protection from the sun than Coppertone sunscreens with an SPF of 50 when, in actuality, these sunscreens contain the same active ingredients and provide the same protection from the sun. (Gisvold v. Merck & Co., Inc., Case No. 14-cv-01371, S.D. Cal.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Merck & Co., Inc. and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
A reminder to be careful about ad claims that may seem too good to be true.
The bottom line? Toothpaste tubes aren’t generally getting recycled.
Lawsuits allege products contain ingredients harmful to coral reefs and marine life.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.
Company walks back composting claim following TINA.org inquiry sparked by self-regulatory ad challenge.