There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Katen et al. v. Lyons Magnus, LLC
22-cv-14293, S.D. Fla.
(Aug. 2022)
Radford et al. v. Lyons Magnus, LLC et al.
23-cv-88, E.D. Cal.
(Jan. 2023)
Lyons Ready Care, Lyons Barista Style, Glucerna, Intelligentsia, Kate Farms, Oatly, Premier Protein, Stumptown Cold Brew Coffee and various other products
Failing to disclose that products may contain bacteria (cronobacter sakazakii and clostridium botulinum) that can cause infections and other illnesses
Katen case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Radford case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.