Lens.com
Don’t let this company blindside you with its deceptive pricing.
Lume
Case Name (Date)
Nelson et al. v. Lume Deodorant, LLC
23-cv-3629, E.D.N.Y.
(May 2023)
Product/Service
Lume deodorant
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing products as “clinically proven to block body odor all day, and continue to control odor for 72 hours” when the scientific evidence the company relies on to make such claims does not support the assertion
Misleadingly marketing products as “aluminum free” when aluminum is not found in any deodorants
Status
Pending
The Latest
On Shoes
Lawsuit pokes holes in company’s Swiss branding.
Junk Fees at JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Airports
Why are these airport vendors slyly charging consumers for “employee benefits”?
FTC Takes TruHeight’s Growth Claims Down a Few Pegs
Supplement maker agrees to pay $750K to settle deceptive health claims lawsuit.
FTC Cracks Down on Forever Living Following Years of Deception
Settlement comes after TINA.org exposed thousands of deceptive income claims.