There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Markham et al. v. LesserEvil LLC
23-cv-3412, N.D. Cal.
(July 2023)
Lil Puffs
Making nutrient content claims on foods intended for children under the age of two when such claims are prohibited by the FDA
Misleadingly marketing that products provide physical health benefits for children under the age of two when they are harmful to them
Deceptively marketing products as nutritious and healthful when they contain unsafe fats that increase the risk of health issues, including coronary heart disease
Failing to make mandatory disclosures with nutrient content claims, in violation of federal and state regulations
Pending
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.