Joe’s Jeans
July 2017: A state court judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
March 2017: A state court judge preliminarily approved a settlement of this action. The settlement, which was amended in November 2016 and February 2017, also resolves two related lawsuits:
- Noiman v. Hudson Clothing, LLC, Case No. 37-2015-566, San Diego Superior Court
- Schulert v. Hudson Clothing, LLC, Case No. 15-cv-276, D. ME.
According to the settlement terms, class members may receive one tote bag worth $55 or one t-shirt worth $68 for each product purchased. In addition, the company agreed to comply laws that govern Made in USA marketing. A final approval hearing is scheduled for July 28, 2017. For more information, go to http://www.joesjeanssettlement.com/.
March 2016: An amended complaint making the same claims was filed.
July 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Joe’s Jeans for allegedly labelling jeans as being “Made in USA” when, according to plaintiffs, they contain foreign-made parts. (Card et al v. Joe’s Jeans, Inc. and Does 1-100, Case No. 37-2015-00021834, California Superior Court – County of San Diego)
For more information about Made in the USA claims, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
US Cellular: ‘Four Free Phones and Four Lines for $90’
What you need to know about this offer.
Monetizing Minors: Aneliese German (aka Lisi Shops)
What’s this kidfluencer doing promoting a “youth cream”?
This Secretive Company Built An Empire By Hawking Bad Financial And Health Advice On Facebook
Emily Baker-White, Forbes
Instaflex Advanced
Can this joint supplement back up its stiff promises?
Renewal by Andersen Reported for Making Deceptive Made in USA Claims
MADISON, CONN. July 1, 2025 – Renewal by Andersen, which bills itself as “one of largest replacement window companies in the country,” is deceptively marketing its products as Made in…