BullyKamp
FDA warns that this pet company’s marketing bites off more than it can chew.
iTalk Global Communications
February 2021: This case was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled..
August 2020: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 20-cv-7150, C.D. Cal.)
July 2020: A class-action lawsuit was filed against the provider of international communication and television services iTalk Global Communications for allegedly violating California law by offering service for a limited period of time without adequately disclosing that consumers who sign up would be enrolled in an automatic renewal program and continuous service plan. Plaintiffs also claim that the company does not adequately disclose its cancellation and refund policies. (Wu et al v. iTalk Global Communications, Inc., Case No. 20STCV25343, California State Court – Los Angeles)
The Latest
CFPB Proposes Paycheck Advance Rule
TINA.org joins coalition of consumer organizations in support of the proposed rule
ARMRA Colostrum Supplements
Company distances itself from touted “studies” while continuing to use deceptive health claims.
Amazon $700 Weekly Vehicle Advertisement Program
Can you earn a salary just by placing a small sticker on your car?
CATrends: Fish Oil Supplements Marketed to Support Heart Health
Lawsuits accuse companies of using deceptive claims to reel in consumers.