
Little Ceaser’s Crazy Puffs
No eyebrows were harmed in the making of this Crazy Puffs commercial
February 2021: This case was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled..
August 2020: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Case No. 20-cv-7150, C.D. Cal.)
July 2020: A class-action lawsuit was filed against the provider of international communication and television services iTalk Global Communications for allegedly violating California law by offering service for a limited period of time without adequately disclosing that consumers who sign up would be enrolled in an automatic renewal program and continuous service plan. Plaintiffs also claim that the company does not adequately disclose its cancellation and refund policies. (Wu et al v. iTalk Global Communications, Inc., Case No. 20STCV25343, California State Court – Los Angeles)
No eyebrows were harmed in the making of this Crazy Puffs commercial
TINA.org reader was charged a lot more than the advertised price. He’s not alone.
TINA.org explores the divide between the marketing and the science.
Be wary of these life-changing claims.
TINA.org reader receives a suspicious email.