There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
September 2017: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. because the parties reached a resolution of all the claims, the terms of which were not disclosed.
June 2017: A class-action lawsuit was filed against iSpring Water Systems for allegedly falsely marketing water filtration systems as made in the United States when, according to plaintiffs, the products are either wholly or partially made outside the U.S. (Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint later in the month.) (O’Sullivan et al v. iSpring Water Systems, LLC, Case No. 17-cv-2237, N. D. GA.)
For more information about made in the USA claims, click here.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.