There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Flick et al. v. M.I. Industries, Inc. d/b/a Instinct Pet Foods
26-cv-1470, S.D. Cal.
(March 2026)
Instinct Pet Foods Original Real Recipe, Raw Meals, and Raw Boost Mixers dog foods
Falsely marketing products as containing no artificial preservatives when they contain the artificial preservative ingredients citric acid and tocopherols
Pending
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.