IcyHot Patch

Fuller et al v. Chattem, Inc.
21-cv-5436, N.D. Cal.
(April 2021)

IcyHot Patch

Making misleading pain relief claims

Misleadingly marketing the product as “Max Strength Lidocaine” when other products deliver more lidocaine and are more effective

Misleadingly marketing the patch as “fast acting” when it does not provide immediate pain relief

Falsely claiming that the product provides 12 hours of pain relief when it does not stay on for even six hours

Falsely marketing product as compliant with FDA regulations when it is not

Pending

Is it still a money-back guarantee if you end up paying hundreds of dollars?

Lawsuits allege foods and beverages aren’t as healthy as you might think.

Let’s be honest, the goal is to get old.

Herb Weisbaum, The ConsumerMan, Consumers’ Checkbook

iFLO AC Cleaner

Is this device maker blowing hot air when it comes to its clog-free claims?