IcyHot Patch

Fuller et al v. Chattem, Inc.
21-cv-5436, N.D. Cal.
(April 2021)

IcyHot Patch

Making misleading pain relief claims

Misleadingly marketing the product as “Max Strength Lidocaine” when other products deliver more lidocaine and are more effective

Misleadingly marketing the patch as “fast acting” when it does not provide immediate pain relief

Falsely claiming that the product provides 12 hours of pain relief when it does not stay on for even six hours

Falsely marketing product as compliant with FDA regulations when it is not

Pending

A proposed rule change could make it harder to know what you’ll actually pay for a flight.

Corporate bullies are weaponizing the legal system to silence the truth.

Tinggly

The hidden cost to these gift boxes.

Following lawsuit, Texas AG launches probe into energy drink’s “youth-oriented branding strategies.”

What you need to know about this shady e-commerce site.