IcyHot Patch

Fuller et al v. Chattem, Inc.
21-cv-5436, N.D. Cal.
(April 2021)

IcyHot Patch

Making misleading pain relief claims

Misleadingly marketing the product as “Max Strength Lidocaine” when other products deliver more lidocaine and are more effective

Misleadingly marketing the patch as “fast acting” when it does not provide immediate pain relief

Falsely claiming that the product provides 12 hours of pain relief when it does not stay on for even six hours

Falsely marketing product as compliant with FDA regulations when it is not

Pending

Unearthing the fees that Fisher charges but doesn’t disclose in some of its TV ads.

The deadline to submit a comment on the agency’s new proposed definition is Dec. 28.

Getting rid of old, smelly clothes ain’t nothin’ but a heartbreak.

Think twice before sticking nonstick cooking pans in the dishwasher.

This crypto scam has cost hundreds of people thousands of dollars.