Case Name (Date)

Fuller et al v. Chattem, Inc.
21-cv-5436, N.D. Cal.
(April 2021)


Product/Service

IcyHot Patch


Allegations

Making misleading pain relief claims

Misleadingly marketing the product as “Max Strength Lidocaine” when other products deliver more lidocaine and are more effective

Misleadingly marketing the patch as “fast acting” when it does not provide immediate pain relief

Falsely claiming that the product provides 12 hours of pain relief when it does not stay on for even six hours

Falsely marketing product as compliant with FDA regulations when it is not


Status

Pending



The Latest

Filters

TINA.org Files FTC Complaint against Homeaglow

Press Release

TINA.org Files FTC Complaint against Homeaglow

MADISON, CONN. Sept. 9, 2025 – An investigation by consumer advocacy organization truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org) has found that Homeaglow is deceptively advertising $19 home cleanings in order to lure consumers into…


Show More