Hudson Clothing’s Made in USA Claims
June 2017: A state court judge granted final approval of the settlement agreement.
March 2017: A state court judge preliminarily approved a settlement that resolves both the Noiman and Schulert actions. The settlement, which was amended in November 2016 and February 2017, also resolves another related lawsuit: Card et al v. Joe’s Jeans, Inc.
According to the settlement terms, class members may receive one tote bag worth $55 or one t-shirt worth $68 for each product purchased. In addition, the company agreed to comply with laws that govern Made in USA marketing. A final approval hearing is scheduled for July 28, 2017. For more information, go to http://www.joesjeanssettlement.com/.
December 2016: This action was stayed until September 1, 2017, at which time the parties will determine if a dismissal of this case is appropriate based on the outcome of other related California actions, Noiman v. Hudson Clothing and Card v. Joe’s Jeans.
July 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Hudson Clothing alleging that the company misleadingly labels Hudson jeans as “Made in USA” when, according to plaintiffs, the jeans actually contain foreign-made parts. (Schulert et al v. Hudson Clothing, LLC, Case No. 15-cv-00276, D. ME.)
For more information about “Made in USA” claims and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
New York City is Taking on Shady Subscriptions
And TINA.org is all for it.
What You Should Know about Kalshi
Prediction market faces legal challenges on multiple fronts.
NJ tax dollars spent on ‘Blue Ribbon’ school awards that critics call deceptive
Julie O’Connor, NJ Spotlight News
The Regulatory Loopholes Behind Prevagen’s Rise
Sara Talpos, Med Shadow
CATrends: Tequilas Marketed as 100% Agave
Ingredient claims come into the limelight.