
These Super Bowl LVIII Advertisers Have Been Taken to Court for Deceptive Marketing
Several of this year’s Super Bowl advertisers have run into legal trouble for alleged deceptive marketing.
December 2018: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
November 2018: Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint similarly alleging that the company’s class rings contain less gold than represented on the band and in marketing materials.
July 2018: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Herff Jones for allegedly misrepresenting the proportion of gold in its class rings for high school and college graduates and for failing to disclose the actual amount of gold in the rings. (Davison et al v. Herff Jones, LLC and Herf Jones, Inc., Case No. 18-cv-4617, N. D. CA.)
Several of this year’s Super Bowl advertisers have run into legal trouble for alleged deceptive marketing.
Consumer complaints regarding alleged surprise charges are piling up.
Holy crop.
It’s not the first time the company has been accused of pulling a bait and switch.
Company makes marketing changes following TINA.org inquiry.