There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Lewis et al. v. Greystar California, Inc. d/b/a Greystar
24-cv-1619, S.D. Cal.
(Sept. 2024)
Lopez et al. v. Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC d/b/a Greystar et al.
25-cv-378, N.D. Tex.
(Feb. 2025)
Greystar Rentals
Failing to adequately disclose a $1-$5 “Utility Admin Fee” to tenants
Lewis case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Lopez case: Pending
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.