There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In December 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Green Dot for, among other things, allegedly misleadingly marketing refillable credit cards as secure and reliable when, according to plaintiffs, such claims are not true and consumers have difficulty accessing the money on the cards. (Jackson et al v. Green Dot Corp., Case No. 18DA-CC00054, Missouri State Court – Dallas County)
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.