Jury Hands Down a Verdict in Prevagen Deceptive Marketing Case
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
November 2015: The named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed this action When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have not been disclosed.
October 2015: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Gobble, Inc. for, among other things, allegedly failing to adequately disclose the terms of its automatic renewal offers and continuous service offers for its dinner kit subscriptions and, as a result, charges consumers without their consent. (Julius et al v Gobble, Inc., Case No. 15-cv-2463, S. D. CA.)
For more information about other lawsuits regarding automatic renewal offers and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
Verdict comes nine years after TINA.org alerted regulator to supplement’s unsubstantiated health claims.
Regulators have a beef with company’s climate pledge.
Consumers need to be wary of undisclosed incentivized reviews.
Why TINA.org supports FTC’s proposed changes to COPPA Rule but pushes for more.
FTC alleges company pressures consumers into overpaying for its tax filing software.