There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Delphia et al. v. Arcadia Consumer Healthcare, Inc. d/b/a Kramer Laboratories, Inc.
23-cv-60115, S.D. Fla.
(Jan. 2023)
Delphia et al. v. Arcadia Consumer Healthcare, Inc.
23-cv-819, E.D. Cal.
(May 2023)
Delphia et al. v. Arcadia Consumer Healthcare, Inc. d/b/a Kramer Laboratories, Inc.
23-at-462, E.D. Cal.
(May 2023)
Vogel et al. v. Arcadia Consumer Healthcare, Inc. d/b/a Kramer Laboratories, Inc.
23-cv-899, M.D. Fla.
(May 2023)
Fungi Nail Antifungal Liquid
Falsely marketing that products are clinically proven to cure and prevent nail fungus
Delphia (No. 23-cv-60115) case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Delphia (No. 23-cv-819) case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled. as to the named plaintiff and When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled. as to the class members
Delphia (No. 23-at-462) case: Pending
Vogel case: Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.