There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Fullbar Appetite Regulator Bars
December 2014: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
October 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against FullBar, LLC for allegedly misleadingly labeling its fullbar appetite regulator bars – including the chocolate peanut butter, cranberry almond, and chocolate caramel flavors – as “100% Natural” when the bars actually contain unnatural, synthetic, and artificial ingredients. (Livingston et al v. Fullbar, LLC, Case No. 14-cv-62430, S. D. FL.).
For more information about natural claims, click here.
The Latest
TINA.org Action Sheds Light on SunPowerLED’s False Endorsement Claims
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
VIN History USA’s ‘Free’ VIN Report
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
Will the MLM Industry Fix Its Earnings Claims Problem?
New research points to “no.”
TINA.org Supports Citizen Petition Calling for AI Pricing Transparency
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.