PUMA. GO WILD.
Runner’s high – it’s a thing for a reason.
Fullbar Appetite Regulator Bars
December 2014: This action was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
October 2014: A class-action lawsuit was filed against FullBar, LLC for allegedly misleadingly labeling its fullbar appetite regulator bars – including the chocolate peanut butter, cranberry almond, and chocolate caramel flavors – as “100% Natural” when the bars actually contain unnatural, synthetic, and artificial ingredients. (Livingston et al v. Fullbar, LLC, Case No. 14-cv-62430, S. D. FL.).
For more information about natural claims, click here.
The Latest
DSSRC’s Arbonne Decision Gets It Wrong
Council blesses MLM’s use of unsubstantiated earnings claims.
MyLowe’s Rewards Free Shipping
TINA.org hammers out the fine print details of this advertised member perk.
The Rise of ‘Bait-and- Switch Pricing’
Emily Stewart, Business Insider
TINA.org Finds U-Haul Using Bait-and-Switch Pricing Scheme
MADISON, CONN. May 6, 2025 – U-Haul is engaged in a bait-and-switch pricing scheme with its $19.95 truck rental ads, according to an investigation by consumer advocacy organization truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org).…