There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Mishikyan et al. v. OMI Industries, Inc.
25-cv-1183, C.D. Cal.
(Feb. 2025)
Various Fresh Wave cleaning products, including air spray, laundry booster, fabric spray, vacuum beads, litter box gel, and dog shampoo
Falsely marketing products as “plant-based”
Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled.
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.