There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In April 2020, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Draper James, LLC and actress Reese Witherspoon for allegedly misleadingly advertising that teachers who provided their contact information would receive a free dress while supplies lasted during the COVID-19 pandemic without disclosing that the giveaway was a “lottery” and only 250 teachers would receive free dresses. (Galvez et al v. Draper James, LLC and Reese Witherspoon, Case No. 20STCV15386, California State Court – Los Angeles)
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.