Homeaglow’s $19 house cleaning service traps customers in hard-to-cancel subscriptions, watchdog group says
Stephanie Zimmermann, Chicago Sun Times
Equaline Maximum Strength Lidocaine Patches
Case Name (Date)
Sheiner et al. v. Supervlau Inc.
22-cv-10262, S.D.N.Y.
(Dec. 2022)
Product/Service
Equaline Maximum Strength Lidocaine Patches
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing that products provide “Up to 8 Hours of Relief” when they do not adhere for eight hours
Misleadingly marketing products as “Maximum Strength” when they do not stay on for eight hours and, as a result, they do not deliver the “Maximum Strength” amount of lidocaine
Misleadingly marketing that products “Desensitize Aggravated Nerves” when patches are not capable of providing such relief
Status
Pending
The Latest
RushMyPassport
Does this passport service live up to its name?
CATrends: Hypoallergenic Marketing Claims
A rash of lawsuits allege companies are misleading consumers.
Ghost Girls
The Halloween ‘haunt’ that isn’t.
Titleist Golf Balls
Lawsuit accuses company of duping consumers into buying “unwanted” golf balls.