There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
In January 2019, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Beyond Better Foods for allegedly misleadingly marketing Enlighted Ice Cream as ice cream when, according to the complaint, the company replaces the milk fat in the products with a fat derived from vegetables, in violation of federal regulations that require dairy ingredients to be the characterizing ingredients in ice cream. The complaint also claims, among other things, that the ingredient list on the product labels describe erythritol as a “Natural Sweetener” when, according to plaintiffs, it is processed and cannot be described as “natural.” (Hightower et al v. Beyond Better Foods, LLC, Case No. 19-cv-4, E. D. NY.)
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.