Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Energizer Max Power Bank
Case Name (Date)
Mentzer et al. v. Energizer Brands, LLC
23-cv-2028, C.D. Ill.
(Feb. 2023)
Product/Service
Energizer Max Power Bank
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh when the actual charge capacity is only 6,000 to 6,600 mAh
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
The Latest
Wuffy and Other ‘AI’ Dogs
Can these “robot” puppies replace man’s best friend?
Ellipse by LegXercise (aka Ellipse One)
Can you actually work out without the work?
US Patent and Trademark Office Impersonator Reported to FTC
MADISON, CONN. Feb. 11, 2026 – A company calling itself “Patent & Trademark Office” is violating the FTC’s Impersonation Rule as well as the FTC Act by falsely posing as…
TINA.org Takes Action against Trademark Imposter Scam
Complaint to FTC cites violations of agency’s Impersonation Rule.
Linda & Rachel Boutique
TINA.org digs into shop’s purported Newport roots, and more.