Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Energizer Max Power Bank
Case Name (Date)
Mentzer et al. v. Energizer Brands, LLC
23-cv-2028, C.D. Ill.
(Feb. 2023)
Product/Service
Energizer Max Power Bank
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh when the actual charge capacity is only 6,000 to 6,600 mAh
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
The Latest
CVS Rewards Phishing Scam
TINA.org reader receives a suspicious email.
Consumers Throw Flags on Super Bowl Advertisers
Six big game marketers that have been accused of fumbling ad claims.
Nobl’s Carry-On
This marketing may come with some baggage.
Gladiators star under fire for ‘promoting brand accused of deceptively marketing body-building food supplements to kids’
Madison Burgess, Daily Mail
Orangetheory Fitness’ Free Class
This gym may want to work harder at being transparent about this offer.