Energizer’s AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
Energizer Max Power Bank
Case Name (Date)
Mentzer et al. v. Energizer Brands, LLC
23-cv-2028, C.D. Ill.
(Feb. 2023)
Product/Service
Energizer Max Power Bank
Allegations
Misleadingly marketing portable chargers as 10,000 mAh when the actual charge capacity is only 6,000 to 6,600 mAh
Status
Pending
Class-Action Tracker
Energizer AA MAX Batteries
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that batteries are “Up to 50% longer lasting than basic alkaline in demanding devices” when such claims are not true
The Latest
TideWe
Don’t get lost in this outdoor company’s dubious origin story.
Homeaglow’s $19 house cleaning service traps customers in hard-to-cancel subscriptions, watchdog group says
Stephanie Zimmermann, Chicago Sun Times
RushMyPassport
Does this passport service live up to its name?
CATrends: Hypoallergenic Marketing Claims
A rash of lawsuits allege companies are misleading consumers.
Ghost Girls
The Halloween ‘haunt’ that isn’t.