There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Scheibe et al. v. eSupplements, LLC d/b/a Nutricost
22-cv-1765, S.D. Cal.
(Nov. 2022)
EAA and Pre-Workout Powders
Misrepresenting the number of calories in dietary supplements
Falsely advertising products as natural when they contain artificial flavors
Pending
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.