There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Fehrenbach et al. v. Dreamland Baby Co.
24-cv-1112, C.D. Cal.
(May 2024)
Fehrenbach et al. v. Dreamland Baby Co.
24-cv-3406, N.D. Cal.
(June 2024)
Dream weighted sleep products
Falsely marketing products as safe, “design[ed] … according to the American Academy of Pediatrics safe sleep guidelines” and “exceed[ing] all United States Consumer Product Safety Commission Standards”
Fehrenbach case (No. 1112): Voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.
Fehrenbach case (No. 3406): Pending
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.