Discounted Prices at Van Heusen
September 2020: A federal judge dismissed the complaint concluding that the named plaintiff failed to meet the heightened pleading standard for fraud-based claims and failed to allege that he was…
October 2018: A state court judge preliminarily approved a settlement agreement that provides class members with a $6.50 merchandise certificate to use toward the future purchase of one item. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for April 5, 2019. For more information, go to http://www.ramossettlement.com/.
June 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against PVH Corp. for allegedly falsely marketing that the items sold at Van Heusen outlets are significantly discounted by comparing the outlet’s price to an inflated “retail price” that does not reflect a price at which the items have been sold. (Ramos et al v. PVH Corp., Case No. 34-2018-00234829, California State Court – Sacramento)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of outlet stores, click here.
Illegal claims that company’s products prevent hair loss also need to go.
MADISON, CONN. December 1, 2022 – Acting on a complaint filed by ad watchdog, truthinadvertising.org (TINA.org), California regulators have reached a settlement with lingerie company Savage X Fenty, originally a joint venture between…
This annual heartstring-tugging tradition skates into another year.
Complaints allege violations of state securities laws.
Lingerie company agrees to pay $1.2 million to settle lawsuit