Discounted Prices at Van Heusen
September 2020: A federal judge dismissed the complaint concluding that the named plaintiff failed to meet the heightened pleading standard for fraud-based claims and failed to allege that he was…
October 2018: A state court judge preliminarily approved a settlement agreement that provides class members with a $6.50 merchandise certificate to use toward the future purchase of one item. A final fairness hearing is scheduled for April 5, 2019. For more information, go to http://www.ramossettlement.com/.
June 2018: A class-action lawsuit was filed against PVH Corp. for allegedly falsely marketing that the items sold at Van Heusen outlets are significantly discounted by comparing the outlet’s price to an inflated “retail price” that does not reflect a price at which the items have been sold. (Ramos et al v. PVH Corp., Case No. 34-2018-00234829, California State Court – Sacramento)
For more of TINA.org’s coverage of outlet stores, click here.
HIP HOP PSA: “We need real prices and transparency in healthcare.”
But the majority of brand partners will still lose money.
Investment newsletter publisher needs to clip its wings.
Lawsuits challenge the amount of meat and toppings depicted in fast-food marketing images.