Most Deceptive Ads of 2024
Here were some of the worst ads TINA.org investigated this year.
In 2010, a class action was brought against Diamond Foods alleging that the company made false and misleading statements in its marketing material about the health benefits of eating walnuts. (Zeisel v. Diamond Foods, Inc., Case No. 3:10-cv-1192-JSW, N.D.Ca.)
Update: In 2012, the parties settled this lawsuit. Diamond agreed to provide $2.6 million to reimburse consumers who bought its walnuts. If you purchased Diamond of California walnuts between 2006 and 2012, you may be eligible for a refund of $3.25 or $8.25.
Here were some of the worst ads TINA.org investigated this year.
Lawsuit alleges products’ ginger ale taste comes from a secret artificial ingredient.
Hidden fee is a bummer.
Some class-action settlements that left consumers behind.
This store’s discounts do not go by the book.