Skull Shaver’s Early Bird Sale
Trying to take advantage of this sale may not be as smooth as advertised.
In 2010, a class action was brought against Diamond Foods alleging that the company made false and misleading statements in its marketing material about the health benefits of eating walnuts. (Zeisel v. Diamond Foods, Inc., Case No. 3:10-cv-1192-JSW, N.D.Ca.)
Update: In 2012, the parties settled this lawsuit. Diamond agreed to provide $2.6 million to reimburse consumers who bought its walnuts. If you purchased Diamond of California walnuts between 2006 and 2012, you may be eligible for a refund of $3.25 or $8.25.
Trying to take advantage of this sale may not be as smooth as advertised.
Cecilia D’Anastasio, Bloomberg
TINA.org digs into school’s debt-free claims.
Why agency independence is in the best interests of consumers.
What exactly does this running brand mean by “your return is on us”?