Wells & Monroe Charleston
Who’s actually behind this purported local boutique?
December 2015: This action was voluntarily dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement. The terms of the agreement have not been disclosed.
May 2015: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Cricket Wireless, LLC. The complaint, which was transferred to federal court in June 2015, alleges that the company misleadingly marketed phones as “4G/LTE” (i.e., the phone would receive a 4G/LTE signal) when, in reality, the company did not have the capability to provide 4G/LTE services to a majority of customers. (Barraza et al v. Cricket Wireless, LLC, AT&T Inc., and LEAP Wireless International, Inc. and Does 1-100, Case No. 15-cv-2471, N. D. CA.)
For more information about the misleading marketing of phones and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
Who’s actually behind this purported local boutique?
A hidden subscription is just the start.
Jenny Ahn, Michelle Cera, Ruth Reader, Hunterbrook
Lawsuits allege marketing doesn’t pass the smell test.
Can these bottles really keep drinks hot for up to six hours?