Austria Tourism: Non Disclosure Austria
This country’s recent campaign introduces a clever way to protect its hidden gems.
Cricket’s 4G/LTE Services
December 2015: This action was voluntarily dismissed because the parties reached a settlement agreement. The terms of the agreement have not been disclosed.
May 2015: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Cricket Wireless, LLC. The complaint, which was transferred to federal court in June 2015, alleges that the company misleadingly marketed phones as “4G/LTE” (i.e., the phone would receive a 4G/LTE signal) when, in reality, the company did not have the capability to provide 4G/LTE services to a majority of customers. (Barraza et al v. Cricket Wireless, LLC, AT&T Inc., and LEAP Wireless International, Inc. and Does 1-100, Case No. 15-cv-2471, N. D. CA.)
For more information about the misleading marketing of phones and TINA.org’s coverage of the issue, click here.
The Latest
Regulators Deliver Actions against HelloFresh
Regulatory activity following TINA.org’s 2022 complaint.
JetBlue’s ‘Flight Disruptions’ Refund Policy
Clear policy or moving target?
LifeLock’s Identity Theft Protection
Is your Social Security number as vulnerable as this company claims?
The McRib
Lawsuit alleges the McRib is a McScam.