There Should Be a Price to Pay for Knowingly Lying to Consumers
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Stewart et al. v. Nutramax Laboratories Consumer Care, Inc.
25-cv-253, M.D. Fla.
(Feb. 2025)
Cosamin DS, Cosamin ASU, Cosamin Sport, and Cosamin Muscle & Joint Supplements
Misleadingly marketing that products relieve pain and provide various joint health benefits when scientific evidence does not support such claims
Pending
Why TINA.org wants the Supreme Court to address proof of harm in Lanham Act cases.
Letters alert agencies and organizations to company’s improper marketing.
TINA.org discovers some roadblocks to unlocking this purportedly free offer.
New research points to “no.”
Why disclosures are key to protecting informed consumer choice and competition.