U-Haul Needs to Pack Up Its Deceptive ‘$19.95’ Truck Ads
TINA.org calls on regulators to stop moving company’s bait and switch.
April 2014: This case was voluntarily dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
December 2013: A class-action lawsuit was filed against Coca-Cola Company for allegedly falsely advertising its beverages as containing no artificial flavors or chemical preservatives when they actually contain phosphoric acid, an artificial ingredient used both for flavoring and as a preservative. Plaintiffs also claim that the company’s false statements and failure to disclose the presence of artificial flavoring and chemical preservatives in its beverages violate both federal and Arkansas state law. (Rankin et al v. The Coca-Cola Company and Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc., Case No. 13-cv-00690, E. D. AR.).
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Coca-Cola Company and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
TINA.org calls on regulators to stop moving company’s bait and switch.
Lead defendants agree to surrender $90M in assets, including cars, homes and a yacht.
What you should know about ingredient studies.
Will master resell rights actually give you the dream life?
Tanya Gazdik, Media Post