Citibank’s Overdraft and Insufficient Funds Fees
Allegations: Misrepresenting how many overdraft or insufficient funds fees consumers could be charged on a single transaction
In February 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Citibank for allegedly misleadingly marketing that the bank charges no more than $12 a month for basic checking account services without telling customers that there are circumstances – such as when the account does not have enough funds to pay the monthly checking account fee – where they may be charged more than $12 a month. (Lopez et al v. Citibank, N.A., Case No. 18-at-146, E.D. Cal.)
For more information about class-action lawsuits filed against banks and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
Allegations: Misrepresenting how many overdraft or insufficient funds fees consumers could be charged on a single transaction
Allegations: Marketing that the bank is dedicated to military members, veterans, and their families and provides more benefits than required under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) when it systematically…
Lawsuits throw the red flag on a number of DFS platforms.
This is not a sitewide perk.
These players dropped the ball in their recent offseason announcements.
Refunds for consumers duped into signing up for “VIP” memberships.
Rosewater ingredient claims wilt upon a closer look.