Citibank’s Overdraft and Insufficient Funds Fees
Allegations: Misrepresenting how many overdraft or insufficient funds fees consumers could be charged on a single transaction
Espin et al. v. Citibank, N.A.
22-cv-383, E.D.N.C.
(Sept. 2022)
Credit cards
Marketing that the bank is dedicated to military members, veterans, and their families and provides more benefits than required under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) when it systematically deprives eligible servicemembers of SCRA benefits, charges higher interest rates than promised, fails to waive fees as promised, and fails to properly calculate debt forgiveness
Stayed pending Citibank’s appeal of a decision to deny arbitration
Allegations: Misrepresenting how many overdraft or insufficient funds fees consumers could be charged on a single transaction
June 2019: A federal judge granted the bank’s motion to compel arbitration and the case was stayed pending the outcome of arbitration. February 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against…
In February 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Citibank for allegedly misleadingly marketing that the bank charges no more than $12 a month for basic checking account services without…
Company distances itself from touted “studies” while continuing to use deceptive health claims.
Can you earn a salary just by placing a small sticker on your car?
Lawsuits accuse companies of using deceptive claims to reel in consumers.
U.K. ad regulator takes issue with celeb endorsement.
Why “taking BART” from Oakland to San Francisco costs more than advertised in this billboard.