Citibank’s Overdraft and Insufficient Funds Fees
Allegations: Misrepresenting how many overdraft or insufficient funds fees consumers could be charged on a single transaction
In February 2018, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Citibank for allegedly misleadingly marketing that the bank charges no more than $12 a month for basic checking account services without telling customers that there are circumstances – such as when the account does not have enough funds to pay the monthly checking account fee – where they may be charged more than $12 a month. (Lopez et al v. Citibank, N.A., Case No. 18-at-146, E.D. Cal.)
For more information about class-action lawsuits filed against banks and TINA.org’s coverage of them, click here.
Allegations: Misrepresenting how many overdraft or insufficient funds fees consumers could be charged on a single transaction
Allegations: Marketing that the bank is dedicated to military members, veterans, and their families and provides more benefits than required under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) when it systematically…
June 2019: A federal judge granted the bank’s motion to compel arbitration and the case was stayed pending the outcome of arbitration. February 2019: A class-action lawsuit was filed against…
Not all free shipping claims are cut from the same cloth.
FDA warns that this pet company’s marketing bites off more than it can chew.
Rihanna embodies the triumphant and free-spirited femininity of J’adore through the lens of Steven Klein.
TINA.org joins coalition of consumer organizations in support of the proposed rule
Company distances itself from touted “studies” while continuing to use deceptive health claims.