Chipotle Mexican Grill Non-GMO Claims
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that items on its menus contain “only non-GMO ingredients”
December 2016: The named plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the November 2016 Order and subsequent December 2016 judgment.
November 2016: A federal judge granted Chipotle’s motion for summary judgment, denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, and dismissed the complaint When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled..
April 2016: A federal judge dismissed the claims for injunctive relief in the Reilly case finding that the named plaintiff failed to allege a threat of future injury. The claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The other claims will move forward.
March 2016: After plaintiffs in the Gallagher case filed an amended complaint, the named plaintiff voluntarily dismissed her claims. The claims were dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled.. The reasons for the dismissal have not yet been disclosed.
February 2016: A federal judge granted Chipotle Mexican Grill’s motion to dismiss the Gallagher complaint finding, among other things, that the complaint did not sufficiently allege an economic injury (i.e., that the named plaintiff purchased any products made with ingredients containing GMOs). The complaint was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed without prejudice, an amended version of the complaint can be refiled..
The Reilly lawsuit remains pending.
August and September 2015: Two false advertising class-action lawsuits were filed against Chipotle Mexican Grill alleging that the restaurant falsely advertises that its food does not contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs) when it actually does. To read each complaint, click on the case information below.
For more information about other class-action lawsuits filed against Chipotle and TINA.org’s coverage of the company, click here.
Allegations: Misleadingly representing that items on its menus contain “only non-GMO ingredients”
Allegations: Falsely representing that gift cards are treated the same as cash
Allegations: Misleadingly marketing that meat comes from responsibly and humanely raised animals
Allegations: Deceptively hiding delivery charges from customers
September 2019: This case was transferred from state court to federal court. (Cruz et al v. Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc., Case No. 19-cv-8068, C. D. CA.) July 2019: A class-action…
June 2014: Pursuant to an agreement reached by the parties, a federal judge entered a judgment in favor of Chipotle. More details about the agreement have not been disclosed. December…
October 2017: This action was dismissed pursuant to a settlement agreement in which Chipotle agreed not to advertise Chorizo burritos as having fewer calories than they have and to pay…
August 2016: A federal judge dismissed some of the claims in this lawsuit. The judge allowed claims based on Chipotle’s advertising statement that it uses “Only NON-GMO Ingredients” to move…
Be wary of claims of free or low-cost delivery.
This year reader tips led to dozens of ad alerts, as well as a complaint to regulators.
A “$0 Delivery Fee” doesn’t equal “free delivery.”