Cetaphil® Skin Care Products
March 2017: This action was dismissed When a complaint is dismissed with prejudice, it cannot be refiled., the reasons for which have not been disclosed.
September 2016: A false advertising class-action lawsuit was filed against Galderma Laboratories in September 2016 (and transferred to federal court in October 2016) for allegedly misleadingly representing that Cetaphil® skin care products treat or mitigate eczema when, in reality, they do not. (Greenberg et al v. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. and Does 1-100, Case No. 16-cv-6090, N. D. CA.)
Class-Action Tracker
The Latest
Influencers’ quiet disclosures lagged behind LVCVA’s loud promotion of Formula One race
Kyle Chouinard, Las Vegas Sun
Regulators Deliver Actions against HelloFresh
Regulatory activity following TINA.org’s 2022 complaint.
JetBlue’s ‘Flight Disruptions’ Refund Policy
Clear policy or moving target?
LifeLock’s Identity Theft Protection
Is your Social Security number as vulnerable as this company claims?
The McRib
Lawsuit alleges the McRib is a McScam.